|
|
|  HEALTH CAMELID Description of M-Worm verses Gut Worm
By Dr. Steve Hull, First Published on Alpacasite chat list 6/09 Reprinted From SELR newsletter Volume 3, Issue 3 September 1, 2009
There remains a LOT of misunderstandings on parasite control. First, we MUST know what we are talking about. There are two general types of internal worms that camelid owners worry about and must manage. The first, and easiest is the M worm, brain worm, meningial worm or the worm that goes up the spinal cord, eats nerve/ brain tissues and causes paralysis, blindness and then death. Then there are gut parasites. M worm first (I prefer to call it BRAIN worm as this conceptually separates it from gut worms). For those of you east of the Mississippi (and a few sections just west of that - eastern Texas, SE Oklahoma, parts of AK, etc) your parasite control must be the following: Ivermectin injected EVERY month, all year long, at a dose of 1 ml/100 lbs (source -Dr. Steve Purdy, Director U-Mass Camelid Program). For brain worm, there is no blood test, fecal test, or other test that can test for “eggs”. You must do prevention. (ed note: some research indicates a 1 ml/70 lbs. or less - check with YOUR vet!) Now let’s consider gut worms. In the USA, ivermectin was a tremendous parasite killer - from the late 60’s up to about 1012 years ago. Since then virtually all gut parasites have become resistant to it (but NOT M worm). Thus, using ivermectin against gut worms is just worthless - and it gives you a dangerous false sense of security. Ivermectin simply got over used and in situations where it was not needed (like taking antibiotics for a viral cold). The key to a proper gut worming strategy is to give up on the “spring and fall” or just fall, or once every other month worming. Rather use fecal exams to find out if you have gut worms. Then ONLY worm if you have a problem! Otherwise you are just worming “blind” not knowing what you are doing. Th e use of blind worming has resulted in the massive gut ivermectin resistant parasite problem. Let’s not repeat that with the drugs that currently do work on gut worms. Further adding to the confusion is that the brain worm larvae are ingested by mouth and start off in the gut. So these must also be gut worms - right? Then there are well meaning vets that also get confused, don’t keep up or whatever. Wrong. The problem is that alpacas and a few other animals are aberrant hosts and the M worm does NOT stay in the gut. Rather, it invades the spinal cord and as it travels to the brain, it eats nerves. The treatment for M worm is very expensive, not a 100% cure and meanwhile the disease is terribly painful to the animals and they suffer. If you understand the use of monthly heartworm for your dog, then the EXACT same logic applies to your alpacas and the use of monthly injected ivermectin. Yes, the use of monthly ivermectin for M worm will cause gut parasite resistance - but they are resistant already. So that bull is out of the gate, out of the pasture long gone - and it doesn’t matter that the gate is still open! We are now seeing another gut parasite that is deadly - Haemonchus contortus (aka, barberpole worm, goat worm, H. contortus). This is one that drinks blood and lives in the true stomach (not rumen). It literally bleeds the animal dry internally and can reproduce at a very fast rate (just s couple of weeks). And no, it is NOT just in the south (Texas) it is now all over the USA. Bottom lines. If you are east of the Mississippi (and a few other areas), you need to do the monthly ivermectin shots all year long (good news - this is inexpensive) . Others need to check for fecal parasites (with a vet that knows how to do it with a centrifuge or 24 hour float) and then ONLY worm if you have a problem. And after you worm, you must check two weeks later to make sure the parasites you treated for are dead. Th e amount of times you need to check for fecal worms depends on where you live. Dry lot may only need a once per year if you have a closed herd. But if you send a lot of animals in/out or are in wet and warm areas, then more frequent is necessary. You need to manage that. Yes, I know that you are on dry lot and that you “never have worms”. Do you have females in for breeding to your males? Do you send animals out for breeding? Do you ever visit other farms and then bring home poop on your shoes? Yes, yes, yes, I do all these things and that is why I must check for gut worms and THEN use the appropriate wormer. Dr. Hull can be contacted by e-mail at steve@timberlakefarms and is available for consults. LAMAS News November 2009
Kansas State University Issues Benefit-Cost Analysis of the National Animal Identification System – Camelids Given Lowest Priority By Karen Conyngham and Teri Baird, Camelid ID Working Group (CWG) May 14, 2009
On April 29, 2009, USDA released the findings of a cost-benefit analysis of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) conducted by Kansas State Univ. Camelids (llamas, alpacas, guanacos, vicunas and camels) are addressed on two pages of the 442-page document. The analysis found that “Both the size and nature of the camelid industry in the United States make it less of an identification priority than cattle, swine, sheep and poultry” and “Due to the small size of the camelid industry and the fact that alpacas are predominantly registered, DNA fingerprinted, and have microchips, the industry has already largely adopted NAIS types of animal ID systems. Thus, we do not estimate specific benefits and costs of NAIS adoption by the industry in this report.”
The analysis also notes the very low susceptibility of camelids to many diseases and it also recognizes that in many states camelids are tested for Tuberculosis (M. bovis) and Brucellosis with no positive tests reported.
published in September 2008 Links to the full text of the analysis, an executive summary of the analysis and the full text of the 2-page section on the camelid industry are available at: www.camelidid.org under the RELATED LINKS tab. USDA documentation is also available on the NAIS web site: http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/ under “What’s New”.
The Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, held an invitation-only stakeholders meeting in Ft. Collins, CO on May 11, 2009 with about 35 people in attendance. CWG member Teri Baird was invited by the Secretary's office to provide a brief statement regarding the camelid section of the NAIS. Teri thanked the Secretary for holding these sessions and thanked USDA for adopting a pragmatic approach to the NAIS. She advocated for the continuation of voluntary participation in the NAIS for camelids. In an interview after this meeting, Sec. Vilsack said he has an open mind about whether to keep animal ID voluntary or to make it mandatory.
As a result of the efforts of the members of the CWG, USDA has recognized that camelids are NOT food animals. On April 16, 2009, the USDA liaison to the Camelid ID Working Group, Dr. John Wiemers, told working group representatives Karen Conyngham and Teri Baird that “We [USDA/Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service] realize that there is already a high degree of traceability and a low level of disease risk in this [the camelid] sector.” Per the NAIS Business Plan version 1.0 , camelids are no longer even included as a “Tier 2” species. The NAIS has been a voluntary program at the federal level since November 2006. With the change in administration in Washington in 2009, the House Agriculture Committee under chairman Collin Peterson of Minnesota has been pushing USDA to review the NAIS and consider making the system mandatory for producers of food animals, with initial emphasis on the cattle sector. USDA ranks food animal species as follows: High – Bovine (cattle) Medium – Porcine (swine); Equine (horses*); Poultry (chickens & turkeys); Cervids (deer & elk**) and Caprine (goats) Low – Ovine (sheep) and Aquatics**
* Horses that, when moved, require an EIA test or health certificate are designated Tier 1. ** Tier-2 species that are part of the existing animal health programs within APHIS/VS.
USDA will be holding another round of listening sessions on the NAIS and how it should be implemented across the country during May and early June. For states and dates, or to submit a written comment at any time, see: http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/feedback.shtml
Llama and alpaca owners and show associations are to be commended for their timely recording of animal movements to and from shows/sales and for their continued observance of biosecurity best practices. These factors will continue to insure that our animals do not require participation in a federal mandatory identification system.
Note however that states may move forward with animal identification programs as they deem necessary. It is important to monitor the status of NAIS in your state. A link to all state departments of agriculture and their animal ID programs is available at: http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/ under the heading “State Web Sites”. Infectious Camelid Respiratory Disease Affecting Major Areas of US Herd
Between the months of June and October 2007, an unknown number of respiratory cases have been seen across the US varying in severity from sub-clinical, mild to severe respiratory disease with fatalities. This recent occurrence of infectious respiratory disease has gone through most of the large camelid population areas in the US leaving many animals affected, some with fatal results.
In The Ohio State University Veterinary Hospital, the initial information we received came from telephone calls and referrals of some animals (mostly alpacas) with mild respiratory signs including nasal discharge, coughing and fever. We examined several animals here and submitted samples for serologic testing and virus isolation through our Ohio Veterinary Diagnostic laboratory and the Veterinary Diagnostic laboratory at Oregon State University. To date, most of the samples submitted for serology have come back negative. I have spoken to individuals from the West and East coasts and have read on the various listservs (Veterinary) that their testing has resulted in similar findings. In some of our cases we have had serologic positives for Adenovirus, (reported in association with pneumonia in llamas); however, this virus is reportedly a common finding in camelids. The possibilities of other agents are being investigated.
The demographics of the animals we have examined include: Older females (>10 years of age) who are in late pregnancy or early after giving birth (10 years of age) with healthy crias (~ 2 weeks of age) presented in respiratory distress, pleural effusion and severe lung consolidation. These animals died en route or were euthanized due to severe pneumonia. Their crias survived without evidence of respiratory disease.
Based upon our local findings, and those reports provided to me from other locations in the US, this possible viral respiratory disease can have serious consequences with secondary bacterial infections. The agent(s) is/are as yet unknown. Many groups are actively conducting tests and accepting samples for future testing once the causative agent has been identified. This is likely a multifactorial condition.
Recommendations for Those Owners Experiencing This Problem:
1. Enforce strict bio-security protocols to prevent animals from bringing this agent to your farm. I would consider animals that return from shows/breeding farms as potential vectors even if not clinically affected. House these animals separately from the breeding stock for a minimum of 10-14 days before re-introducing them to the herd. As the identity of this agent has not been determined, longer isolation periods may be prudent.
2. The quarantine facility should be separated in all aspects from the remainder of the farm. Separate personnel should tend to these animals during their quarantine period. Animal handlers, grooms, etc should be provided with disposable outer wear (including caps and shoe covers) to prevent the spread of infectious agents to other animals through contamination of clothing, footwear, etc. Clean equipment, bedding, feed, and all materials to be used in contact with these animals should be kept separate from the rest of the herd. Handle new animals after other animals on the farm.
3. Maintain strict bio-security of bred females, especially older animals. In our experience these animals are the most severely affected. Limit the stress of handling of pregnant females by evaluation of respiratory rates in pasture (from a distance) and physically restraining only those with an unexpected rise or work in breathing.
4. Have your Veterinarian examine all animals with clinical signs at an early stage. If deemed necessary due to fever, respiratory rates or other concerns, treatment should be initiated. If your Veterinarian needs information on or about this respiratory condition, please feel free to pass this information on to them. Contact information for experienced Veterinary personnel is posted at the bottom of this statement.
5. Obtain blood samples (for serum) from those animals demonstrating the common clinical signs (nasal/ocular discharge, coughing, fever, open mouth breathing) and submit these samples to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory for respiratory serology. Although we may not get information back on what is causing this problem soon, those individuals investigating this respiratory condition indicate that future testing of frozen (banked) serum, especially paired serum samples taken 2-4 weeks apart may be useful in gaining an understanding of this problem.
6. Treatment of those animals with more severe symptoms (fever, pneumonia), should include broad spectrum antibiotics which are effective against gram negative and gram positive bacteria. Those animals we have examined have had a number of opportunistic bacteria isolated from their lungs.
Dr. Jeff Lakritz, Director, ICI 614-292-6661, ext.1
Contact Information for Respiratory Condition of Camelids
Barbara Baker or Nancy Medland, Co-Associate Directors, ICI 614-403-1016 or associatedirector@icinfo.org
Dr. Jeff Lakritz, Director, ICI 614-292-6661, ext.1
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospitals: ask to speak with any veterinarian working with camelids
The University of California, Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital Phone 530-752-0290
California Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory Phone : 530-752-8700
Colorado State University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital Phone : 970-221-4535
Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Phone: 970-297-1281
Oregon State University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital Phone: 541-737-2859
Oregon Veterinary Medical Diagnostic laboratory Phone: 541-737-3261
Washington State University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital Phone 509-335-0711
Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Phone 509-335-9696
| |
|