The MISSOURI LLAMA ASSOCIATION

MissouriLlamaAssociation
About Us
MLA promotes!
Contact Us
Calendar of Events
Membership Form
Member Web Page
Photo Share
MarketPlace
ALERTS
TH@NEWS
Camelid Community
Standards of Care
Travel Regulations
Related Links
Preferred Suppliers
Lending Library

 


HEALTH CAMELID
Description of M-Worm
verses Gut Worm


By Dr. Steve Hull, First Published on Alpacasite chat list 6/09
Reprinted From SELR newsletter Volume 3, Issue 3 September
1, 2009

 

There remains a LOT of misunderstandings on parasite control.
First, we MUST know what we are talking about. There
are two general types of internal worms that camelid owners
worry about and must manage.

The first, and easiest is the M worm, brain worm, meningial
worm or the worm that goes up the spinal cord, eats nerve/
brain tissues and causes paralysis, blindness and then death.
Then there are gut parasites.

M worm first (I prefer to call it BRAIN worm as this conceptually
separates it from gut worms). For those of you east of
the Mississippi (and a few sections just west of that - eastern
Texas, SE Oklahoma, parts of AK, etc) your parasite control
must be the following: Ivermectin injected EVERY month, all
year long, at a dose of 1 ml/100 lbs (source -Dr. Steve Purdy,
Director U-Mass Camelid Program). For brain worm, there
is no blood test, fecal test, or other test that can test for “eggs”.
You must do prevention. (ed note: some research indicates a 1 ml/70
lbs. or less - check with YOUR vet!)

 

Now let’s consider gut worms. In the USA, ivermectin was a
tremendous parasite killer - from the late 60’s up to about 1012
years ago. Since then virtually all gut parasites have become
resistant to it (but NOT M worm). Thus, using ivermectin
against gut worms is just worthless - and it gives you a dangerous
false sense of security. Ivermectin simply got over used and
in situations where it was not needed (like taking antibiotics
for a viral cold).

The key to a proper gut worming strategy is to give up on the
“spring and fall” or just fall, or once every other month worming.
Rather use fecal exams to find out if you have gut worms.
Then ONLY worm if you have a problem! Otherwise you are
just worming “blind” not knowing what you are doing. Th e
use of blind worming has resulted in the massive gut ivermec
tin

resistant parasite problem. Let’s not repeat that with the
drugs that currently do work on gut worms.

Further adding to the confusion is that the brain worm larvae
are ingested by mouth and start off in the gut. So these must
also be gut worms - right? Then there are well meaning vets
that also get confused, don’t keep up or whatever.

Wrong. The problem is that alpacas and a few other animals
are aberrant hosts and the M worm does NOT stay in the gut.
Rather, it invades the spinal cord and as it travels to the brain,
it eats nerves.

The treatment for M worm is very expensive, not a 100%
cure and meanwhile the disease is terribly painful to the animals
and they suffer. If you understand the use of monthly
heartworm for your dog, then the EXACT same logic applies
to your alpacas and the use of monthly injected ivermectin.
Yes, the use of monthly ivermectin for M worm will cause gut
parasite resistance - but they are resistant already. So that bull
is out of the gate, out of the pasture long gone - and it doesn’t
matter that the gate is still open!

We are now seeing another gut parasite that is deadly - Haemonchus
contortus (aka, barberpole worm, goat worm, H.
contortus). This is one that drinks blood and lives in the true
stomach (not rumen). It literally bleeds the animal dry internally
and can reproduce at a very fast rate (just s couple of
weeks). And no, it is NOT just in the south (Texas) it is now
all over the USA.

Bottom lines. If you are east of the Mississippi (and a few other
areas), you need to do the monthly ivermectin shots all year
long (good news - this is inexpensive) . Others need to check
for fecal parasites (with a vet that knows how to do it with a
centrifuge or 24 hour float) and then ONLY worm if you have
a problem. And after you worm, you must check two weeks
later to make sure the parasites you treated for are dead. Th e
amount of times you need to check for fecal worms depends
on where you live. Dry lot may only need a once per year if
you have a closed herd. But if you send a lot of animals in/out
or are in wet and warm areas, then more frequent is necessary.
You need to manage that.

Yes, I know that you are on dry lot and that you “never have
worms”. Do you have females in for breeding to your males?
Do you send animals out for breeding? Do you ever visit other
farms and then bring home poop on your shoes? Yes, yes, yes, I

do all these things and that is why I must check for gut worms
and THEN use the appropriate wormer.

 

Dr. Hull can be contacted by e-mail at steve@timberlakefarms
and is available for consults.

LAMAS News November 2009 
 

Kansas State University Issues Benefit-Cost Analysis of the National Animal Identification System – Camelids Given Lowest Priority

By Karen Conyngham and Teri Baird, Camelid ID Working Group (CWG)

May 14, 2009

 

 

On April 29, 2009, USDA released the findings of a cost-benefit analysis of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) conducted by Kansas State Univ.  Camelids  (llamas, alpacas, guanacos, vicunas and camels) are addressed on two pages of the 442-page document.  The analysis found that “Both the size and nature of the camelid industry in the United States make it less of an identification priority than cattle, swine, sheep and poultry” and “Due to the small size of the camelid industry and the fact that alpacas are predominantly registered, DNA fingerprinted, and have microchips, the industry has already largely adopted NAIS types of animal ID systems.  Thus, we do not estimate specific benefits and costs of NAIS adoption by the industry in this report.”

 

The analysis also notes the very low susceptibility of camelids to many diseases and it also recognizes that in many states camelids are tested for Tuberculosis (M. bovis) and Brucellosis with no positive tests reported.

 

published in September 2008

Links to the full text of the analysis, an executive summary of the analysis and the full text of the 2-page section on the camelid industry are available at: www.camelidid.org under the RELATED LINKS tab.  USDA documentation is also available on the NAIS web site: http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/  under “What’s New”. 

 

The Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, held an invitation-only stakeholders meeting in Ft. Collins, CO on May 11, 2009 with about 35 people in attendance.  CWG member Teri Baird was invited by the Secretary's office to provide a brief

statement regarding the camelid section of the NAIS.  Teri thanked the Secretary for holding these sessions and thanked USDA for adopting a pragmatic approach to the NAIS.  She advocated for the continuation of voluntary participation in the NAIS for camelids.  In an interview after this meeting, Sec. Vilsack said  he has an open mind about whether to keep

animal ID voluntary or to make it mandatory.

 

As a result of the efforts of the members of the CWG, USDA has recognized that camelids are NOT food animals.  On April 16, 2009, the USDA liaison to the Camelid ID Working Group, Dr. John Wiemers, told working group representatives Karen Conyngham and Teri Baird that “We [USDA/Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service] realize that there is already a high degree of traceability and a low level of disease risk in this [the camelid] sector.” Per the NAIS Business Plan version 1.0 , camelids are no longer even included as a “Tier 2” species.

 

The NAIS has been a voluntary program at the federal level since November 2006.  With the change in administration in Washington in 2009, the House Agriculture Committee under chairman Collin Peterson of Minnesota has been pushing USDA to review the NAIS and consider making the system mandatory for producers of food animals, with initial emphasis on the cattle sector.  USDA ranks food animal species as follows:

High – Bovine (cattle)

Medium – Porcine (swine); Equine (horses*); Poultry (chickens & turkeys); Cervids (deer & elk**) and

                Caprine (goats)

Low – Ovine (sheep) and Aquatics**

 

*    Horses that, when moved, require an EIA test or health certificate are designated Tier 1.

**  Tier-2 species that are part of the existing animal health programs within APHIS/VS.

 

USDA will be holding another round of listening sessions on the NAIS and how it should be implemented across the country during May and early June.  For states and dates, or to submit a written comment at any time,  see: http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/feedback.shtml

 

Llama and alpaca owners and show associations are to be commended for their timely recording of animal movements to and from shows/sales and for their continued observance of biosecurity best practices.  These factors will continue to insure that our animals do not require participation in a federal mandatory identification system. 

 

Note however that states may move forward with animal identification programs as they deem necessary.  It is important to monitor the status of NAIS in your state.  A link to all state departments of agriculture and their animal ID programs is available at: http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/   under the heading “State Web Sites”.

 
 

Infectious Camelid Respiratory Disease Affecting Major Areas of US Herd

Between the months of June and October 2007, an unknown number of
respiratory cases have been seen across the US varying in severity from
sub-clinical, mild to severe respiratory disease with fatalities. This
recent occurrence of infectious respiratory disease has gone through
most of the large camelid population areas in the US leaving many
animals affected, some with fatal results.

In The Ohio State University Veterinary Hospital, the initial
information we received came from telephone calls and referrals of some
animals (mostly alpacas) with mild respiratory signs including nasal
discharge, coughing and fever. We examined several animals here and
submitted samples for serologic testing and virus isolation through our
Ohio Veterinary Diagnostic laboratory and the Veterinary Diagnostic
laboratory at Oregon State University. To date, most of the samples
submitted for serology have come back negative. I have spoken to
individuals from the West and East coasts and have read on the various
listservs (Veterinary) that their testing has resulted in similar
findings. In some of our cases we have had serologic positives for
Adenovirus, (reported in association with pneumonia in llamas); however,
this virus is reportedly a common finding in camelids. The possibilities
of other agents are being investigated.

The demographics of the animals we have examined include: Older females
(>10 years of age) who are in late pregnancy or early after giving birth
(10 years of age) with healthy crias (~ 2 weeks of age) presented in
respiratory distress, pleural effusion and severe lung consolidation.
These animals died en route or were euthanized due to severe pneumonia.
Their crias survived without evidence of respiratory disease.

Based upon our local findings, and those reports provided to me from
other locations in the US, this possible viral respiratory disease can
have serious consequences with secondary bacterial infections. The
agent(s) is/are as yet unknown. Many groups are actively conducting
tests and accepting samples for future testing once the causative agent
has been identified. This is likely a multifactorial condition.

Recommendations for Those Owners Experiencing This Problem:

1. Enforce strict bio-security protocols to prevent animals from
bringing this agent to your farm. I would consider animals that return
from shows/breeding farms as potential vectors even if not clinically
affected. House these animals separately from the breeding stock for a
minimum of 10-14 days before re-introducing them to the herd. As the
identity of this agent has not been determined, longer isolation periods
may be prudent.

2. The quarantine facility should be separated in all aspects from
the remainder of the farm. Separate personnel should tend to these
animals during their quarantine period. Animal handlers, grooms, etc
should be provided with disposable outer wear (including caps and shoe
covers) to prevent the spread of infectious agents to other animals
through contamination of clothing, footwear, etc. Clean equipment,
bedding, feed, and all materials to be used in contact with these
animals should be kept separate from the rest of the herd. Handle new
animals after other animals on the farm.

3. Maintain strict bio-security of bred females, especially older
animals. In our experience these animals are the most severely affected.
Limit the stress of handling of pregnant females by evaluation of
respiratory rates in pasture (from a distance) and physically
restraining only those with an unexpected rise or work in breathing.

4. Have your Veterinarian examine all animals with clinical signs
at an early stage. If deemed necessary due to fever, respiratory rates
or other concerns, treatment should be initiated. If your Veterinarian
needs information on or about this respiratory condition, please feel
free to pass this information on to them. Contact information for
experienced Veterinary personnel is posted at the bottom of this
statement.

5. Obtain blood samples (for serum) from those animals
demonstrating the common clinical signs (nasal/ocular discharge,
coughing, fever, open mouth breathing) and submit these samples to a
veterinary diagnostic laboratory for respiratory serology. Although we
may not get information back on what is causing this problem soon, those
individuals investigating this respiratory condition indicate that
future testing of frozen (banked) serum, especially paired serum samples
taken 2-4 weeks apart may be useful in gaining an understanding of this
problem.

6. Treatment of those animals with more severe symptoms (fever,
pneumonia), should include broad spectrum antibiotics which are
effective against gram negative and gram positive bacteria. Those
animals we have examined have had a number of opportunistic bacteria
isolated from their lungs.

Dr. Jeff Lakritz, Director, ICI
614-292-6661, ext.1



Contact Information for Respiratory Condition of Camelids

Barbara Baker or Nancy Medland, Co-Associate Directors, ICI
614-403-1016 or associatedirector@icinfo.org

Dr. Jeff Lakritz, Director, ICI
614-292-6661, ext.1

Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospitals: ask to speak with any
veterinarian working with camelids

The University of California, Davis
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital
Phone 530-752-0290

California Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory
Phone : 530-752-8700

Colorado State University
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital
Phone : 970-221-4535

Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory
Phone: 970-297-1281

Oregon State University
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital
Phone: 541-737-2859

Oregon Veterinary Medical Diagnostic laboratory
Phone: 541-737-3261

Washington State University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital
Phone 509-335-0711

Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
Phone 509-335-9696